|
Its
risky for Illinois politicians
to bet on future growth in gaming revenue
by
Charles N. Wheeler III
Are
we killing the goose thats been laying golden eggs in the
coffers of state and local governments for the last dozen years?
Since
1991, Illinois riverboat gaming industry has produced some
$3.5 billion in tax revenues for the state and for the nine communities
in which the floating casinos have docked.
But
the ongoing bounty may be susceptible to a couple of worrisome trends
documented in Illinois Gaming Board reports and in a new study from
the Illinois Economic and Fiscal Commission. The ominous portents:
Fewer people are heading to the boats. Admissions in July were down
more than 14 percent from the July 2002 tally, a loss of more than
235,000 patrons. Indeed, July was the 11th month in a row to see
fewer bettors on board than in the corresponding month a year earlier.
Casino operators receipts what the house keeps after
paying winning bettors are declining. In July, casinos reported
adjusted gross receipts of $143.6 million, compared to $158.6 million
in July 2002, a dip of more than 9 percent. Monthly receipts have
been less than the previous year for 10 consecutive months.
For
all of fiscal year 2003, admissions were off 4.6 percent, while
receipts dipped almost 2 percent for the states nine licensees.
Still,
despite fewer admissions and lower receipts, the states main
checking account took in $554 million in gaming taxes last year,
some $84 million more than in FY2002. But the increase largely was
due to a July 1, 2002, tax hike that boosted the top rate on the
highest-grossing boats to 50 percent from 35 percent. Even so, the
new money was only about two-thirds of what the tax hike was expected
to produce.
The
FY2003 news was worse for the locals, who get a much larger share
of gaming revenues from admissions fees. Fewer patrons resulted
in a collective loss of almost $3 million, roughly a 2.5 percent
drop, for the eight towns now hosting boats.
In
the current budget, meanwhile, Gov. Rod Blagojevich and Illinois
lawmakers are counting on an additional $190 million in gaming taxes
from yet another rate hike, this one including a 70 percent bite
on receipts in excess of $250 million. They also hope to net $350
million from the sale of a dormant 10th license.
The
projections seem shaky in light of the continuing patron drain documented
in the Gaming Boards monthly reports. And the fiscal commissions
gaming study cautions that increased gaming revenues could be as
low as $125 million in FY2004.
What
were seeing from the numbers is that the state is getting
the revenue because of the tax increase, but the adjusted gross
receipts and the number of participants are down, says Dan
Long, the commissions executive director. The boats
at that rate are not making the investments in their facilities,
and they are cutting back on the freebies and promotional stuff.
Also
skeptical is Tom Swoik, executive director of the Illinois Casino
Gaming Association, the industrys trade group. I don't
believe theyre going to generate anywhere near what theyre
anticipating, he says. Swoik and other industry officials
blame the eroding patron base and declining casino revenues on the
tax hikes, which leave Illinois with the highest gaming taxes in
the nation.
With
an eye to the bottom line, Illinois casino operators have
been belt-tightening for more than a year, laying off workers, cutting
back on expansion plans, limiting promotional activities, shortening
hours, increasing prices for food and drinks, and charging for parking
and admission.
Besides
higher tax rates, Illinois has tighter rules than neighboring states.
Thus, Illinois boats are at a disadvantage against competitors docked
in Indiana, Missouri and Iowa. For example, the top tax rate is
35 percent in Indiana, where five casinos in the states northwestern
corner can accommodate 10,000 gamblers, 24 hours a day. In contrast,
the four boats in suburban Chicago can handle only 4,800 at a time,
and are required to close two hours every day.
So
its no surprise, Swoik says, that the Indiana boats are drawing
Chicago-area customers across the border. In the last fiscal
year, Illinois lost 3.5 percent of its market share to Indiana,
he says. Revenues were up 12 percent for Indiana boats, while
they were down 2 percent for Illinois.
In
the current economic climate, the commission study notes, people
have less money to spend on such nonessential items as entertainment.
Or perhaps the novelty of dockside gambling may have lost
its draw, the study suggests.
Yet,
while casino revenues dropped last year in Illinois, they were up
for boats in all three neighboring states, the study reports. These
figures support the argument that Illinois gaming patrons are looking
elsewhere to board riverboats, the study concludes.
Whatever
the underlying cause for the exodus, gaming revenues arent
likely to grow under current conditions, and an ongoing legal wrangle
could delay the sale of the 10th license for years.
As
lawmakers struggled last spring to find new revenue, the gaming
industry proposed rolling back the earlier tax hikes to a
top rate of 35 percent and letting casinos have more slots
and table games. The changes would level the playing field with
nearby states and keep Illinois gaming dollars at home, industry
leaders said, while producing $274 million more for the state and
$75 million more for local governments.
The
plan went nowhere after Gov. Blagojevich pulled the plug on gaming
talks. But as state finances remain uncertain and bills continue
to pile up, the governor and the legislature might be tempted to
take another look. Dont bet against it.
Charles
N. Wheeler III is director of the Public Affairs Reporting program
at the University of Illinois at Springfield.
Illinois
Issues,September 2003
For information about how to subcribe to Illinois Issues go to:
http://illinoisissues.uis.edu/subscribe/subscribe.html
Go to Illinois Issues blog at http://illinoisissuesblog.blogspot.com/
Write a letter to the editor
I would like to comment on this article
(Please
state month and author of article.)
Ask a staff member
Home
|